Effect of Training for Security in Work (Case study; Construction Sector)
Downloads
Work is a conscious and voluntary activity, natural but troublesome for the fact that it contains attempts to create or to work a useful, material or non-material work. From a terminological point of view, work implies firstly manufacturing activity, namely performing a certain job and secondly the result of this activity, ie the work performed, the work successfully completed. Work is defined as a service, mental or physical implementation, it is defined as human, hand or intellectual activity exercised in the direction of a useful result, designated as a law-enforced effort.
In workplaces where a large number of physical workers are built or built, one of the main problems besides that of workers' coordination is to care for the health and well-being of the project without any accident stopping work on the project. Workers can not always recognize the importance of safety training or think or pinpoint it as unnecessary because they have been doing it for years. But an important benefit of security training is that there is a risk where no one can be immune to accidents. Therefore, it is important for workers to understand the purpose of the training session as to why it will be useful to them, and what may result to follow the rules and security procedures. Training, security should be organized so that the order in which the material is presented complies with the steps to be taken at work. It should also be ensured that every employee understands the training material not only that they have been present but also a test that is provided. These tips are relatively simple and inexpensive, but security gains are great.
In workplaces with a large number of workers, there must be rules and special requirements for the workers and the jobs they will make. Solving these problems has been thought and has been proven in several ways, for example, awareness and training of the team supervisor, so that he or she tends to tell the workers about the proper way of doing the job. The other way that has been proven has been the distribution of key-point books and very little detail for work safety.
These two ways were not efficient because the first problem was that a large number of employees and an attempt to show everyone how they would be doing to be safe for a person who may not be has the qualifications needed to explain that work has been very problematic.
A.J. Romiszowski, (1984”,“Designing Instructional Text”, Routledge, Falmer
Acemoglua, D., Pischke, J.S., (1999), “Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labour Markets”, The Economic Journal, 109, pp.112-142, Blackwell Publishers, USA
Adamson, P., Caple, J., (1996), “The training and development audit evolves: is your training and development budget wasted?”, Journal of European Industrial Training, 20/5, f. 3–12
Aguinis, H., Kraiger, K., “Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society”, Annual Review of Psychology, 2009.60:451-474.
Alan, B., E., Bryman, A., (2011), “Business research methods” Third Edition, Oxford
Aldenderfer, S., Blashfield, R., (1984), “Cluster analysis”, Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Al-Khayyat M. R., Elgamal, A. M., (1997), “A macro model of training and development: validation”, Journal of European Industrial Training, 21 (3), p. 87–101
Alliger, G., Tannenbaum, S., Bennett, W., Traver, H., Shotland, A., (1997), “A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Among Training Criteria”, Personnel Psychology, 50 (2), pp. 341–358
Anderson, R. C., Faust, G. W., Roderick, M. C., (1968), “Overprompting in programmed instruction”, Journal of education psychology, 59, pp. 88-93
Aragón, A., Barba, M. I., & Sanz, R. (2003), “Effects of training on business results”, The International Productivity Review, 16(2), pp.371–380
Arthur, J. B. 1992. “The Link Between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, (45), pp. 488-506.
Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P., Bell, S., (2003), “Effectiveness of Training in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis of Design and Evaluation Features”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), pp. 234–245
Axtell C.M., Maitlis S. and Yearta S.K., (1997), “Predicting Immediate and Longer-term Transfer of Training”, Personnel Review, 26 (3), 201 – 213
Bailey, T., (1993), “Discretionary effort and the organization of work: Employee participa-tion and work reform since Hawthorne”, Working paper, Columbia University, New York
Baldwin, T.T., & Ford, K.J. (1988), “Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research”, Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.
Bandura, A., (1982), “Self-Efficacy Mechanisms in Human Behavior,” American Psychologist 37, pp.122–47
Barge, T., (1989), “Performance appraisal and personal development…the unholy alliance”, Training officer, 25 (12), pp. 359-60
Barnard, M. E., & Rodgers, R. A. (2000), “How are internally oriented HRM policies related to high-performance work practices? Evidence from Singapore”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(6), 1017–1046.