Analysis Development Gaps District and City of South Sulawesi Province Indonesia
Downloads
Development inequality becomes interesting to discuss because of the inequality of development is one of the impact of the beginning of development itself and if not immediately addressed it will be bad for the areas that are left behind. This study aims to determine the inequality of development in 24 districts / cities in South Sulwesi Province. Data that is used is panel data of year 2011-2016 at 24 Regency City in South Sulwesi Province. The data used is sourced from the Central Bureau of Statistics of the Provinces and Regencies and municipalities in South Sulawesi Province. The analysis model used is income inequality analysis, Klassen Tipologi Analysis, Williamson Index, and Theil Index. The result of the analysis shows that there is high income inequality in regency/city in South Sulawesi Province, marked by high gini ratio. On the other hand the Williamson index shows a lower number than the national. This shows that the regional inequality in South Sulawesi Province is lower than the national inequality of the region. Furthermore, Theil Index shows that the existing regional inequality in South Sulawesi Province is more caused by internal factor of Regency/City than external factor.
Akhmad, N.A. Achsani, M. Tambunan, S.A. Mulyo. 2012. Impact of Fiscal Policy on the Agricultural Development in an Emerging Economy: Case Study from the South Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 96:101-112.
Anwar, A. 2005. Ketimpangan Pembangunan Wilayah dan Pedesaan. Tinjauan Kritis. P4W Press Bogor.
Ascani A, R. Crescenzi, and S. Iammarino. 2012. New Economic Geography and Economic Integration: A Review. WP1/02 Search Working Paper.
Aswandi, H dan Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2002. Evaluasi Penetapan Kawasan Andalan: Studi Empiris diKalimantan Selatan 1993-1999. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2002, 27 – 45
Boadway R. and F. Flatters. Efficiency and Equalization Payments in a Federal System of Government: A Synthesis and Extension of Recent Results. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1982, vol. 15, issue 4, 613.
Mahardiki D. dan R.P.Santoso. 2013.Analisis Perubahan Ketimpangan Pendapatan Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Antar Propinsi Di Indonesia 2006-2011. Journal of Economics and Policy. Jejak (2) (2013): 103-213.
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J.A., Özler, B., Simler, K., 2004. On the unequal inequality of poor communities. World Bank Economic Review 18 (3), 401–421.
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS). 2013. Analisis kesenjangan Antar Wilayah. Badan Perencanaan Nasinal (Bappenas). Jakarta.
Kimura, E. 2007.Marginality and Opportunity in The Periphery: the Emergence of Gorontalo Province in North Sulawesi Indonesia: Modern Indonesia Project Cornell University (84), 71-95.
Kurian, N.J. 2007. Widening Economic and Social Disparities: Implications for India. Indian Journal of Medical Research 126(4), 374.
Kuznets S. 1955. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 1 (Mar., 1955), pp. 1-28.
Matsui, K. (2005) Post-Decentralization Regional Economies and Actors: Putting the Capacity of Local Goverments to The Test. The Developing Economies XLIII(1), 171-189.
Rustiadi, E., S. Saefulhakim, dan D.R. Panuju (2009) Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Crestpent Press dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Jakarta.
Sjafrizal. 2012. Ekonomi Wilayah dan Perkotaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Todaro, M.P. and S.C. Smith. 2009. Economic Development. Tenth Edition. Pearson Addison Wesley, New York
Williamson, J.G. 1965. Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of Patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 14, 3-45.
Venables A.J. 2013. Winners and losers from regional integration agreements. The Economic Journal. Volume 113, Issue 490 October 2003. P. 747–76
