Assessment of Holy Angel University – School of Engineering and Architecture Administrators as Transformational and Servant Leaders
Downloads
The leadership style of an individual is influenced by his personality, ability, and skills. Two leadership styles were focused in this study which are transformational and servant leaderships. The level of leaderships of the administrators of the School of Engineering and Architecture (SEA) at Holy Angel University (HAU) for the First Semester School Year 2022-2023 were assessed using self-assessment transformational and servant leadership questionnaires. The assessment resulted that administrative ability is the dominant transformational leader characteristic of the respondents while being creative was the lowest transformational leader characteristic, but still within the high range of the score interpretation. Demonstrating ethical behaviour is the dominant servant leader characteristic but creating value for the community got the lowest characteristic, but still within the moderate range of the score interpretation. The HAU-SEA administrators generally demonstrated the characteristics of a transformational leader and mostly exhibited the behaviours of a servant leader, specifically the exemplary demonstration of ethical behaviours.
Allen, G. P., Moore, W. M., Moser, L. R., Neill, K. K., Sambamoorthi, U., & Bell, H. S. (2016). The role of servant leadership and transformational leadership in academic pharmacy. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 80(7).
Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19-29.
George, J., & Jones, G. (2014).Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior, Sixth Edition. Prentice Hall.
Greenleaf, R. K. (2011). What is servant leadership.
Green, M. T., Rodriguez, R. A., Wheeler, C. A., & Baggerly-Hinojosa, B. (2016). Servant leadership: A quantitative review of instruments and related findings. Servant Leadership: Theory & Practice, 2(2), 5.
Hacker, S., & Roberts, T. (2004). Transformational Leadership: Creating Organizations of Meaning. American Society for Quality (ASQ)
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of management, 44(2), 501-529.
Horsman, J. (2018). Servant-leaders in training: foundations of the philosophy of servant-leadership. USA: Macmillan.
Matteson, J. A., & Irving, J. A. (2006). Servant versus self-sacrificial leadership: A behavioral comparison of two follow-oriented leadership theories. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(1), 36-51.
Northouse, P. (2016). Leadership: theory and practice (7th Ed.). United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc.
Schneider, S. K., & George, W. M. (2011). Servant leadership versus transformational leadership in voluntary service organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
Smith, C. (2005). Servant leadership: The leadership theory of Robert K. Greenleaf. Management Information Organization, 12(2), 145-152.
Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The journal of virtues & leadership, 1(1), 25-30.
Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & organization development journal.
