Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Leaks in Underwater Wells and Pipelines
Downloads
Modern PAM systems deploy hydrophones and distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) networks to capture signals across wide frequency ranges (Ferguson et al., 2010; He and Liu, 2021). These raw signals are processed through signal processing pipelines, pattern recognition algorithms, and machine learning tools to separate meaningful leak signatures from background noise whether from ship traffic, marine life, or ocean currents (Siddique et al., 2023; Gemeinhardt and Sharma, 2023). Time-frequency analysis, spectral density estimation, and automated feature extraction have all improved how reliably these systems identify and classify leak events (Ghazali et al., 2012; Ahadi and Bakhtiar, 2010).
When PAM is integrated with autonomous underwater vehicles or fixed seabed sensor arrays, it becomes capable of covering large, complex pipeline networks in real time (Premus et al., 2022; Eleftherakis and Vicen-Bueno, 2020). Challenges remain: false positives are still a persistent problem, sensor placement requires careful planning, and consistent performance in noisy or variable environments is not always straightforward (Van Walree, 2013; Stojanovic and Preisig, 2009). Active research continues on multi-modal sensing, adaptive signal processing, and AI-driven localization to push detection sensitivity and spatial accuracy further. Taken together, PAM holds genuine promise for transforming subsea asset monitoring, enabling early leak identification, reducing environmental damage, and improving operational efficiency across both mature offshore markets and rapidly expanding developing economies.
Ahadi, M. and Bakhtiar, M.S., 2010. Leak detection in water-filled plastic pipes through the application of tuned wavelet transforms to acoustic emission signals. Applied Acoustics, 71(7), pp.634-639.
Ahn, B., Kim, J., and Choi, B., 2019. Artificial intelligence-based machine learning considering the flow and temperature of the pipeline for leak early detection using acoustic emission. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 210, pp.381-392.
Amirat, A., Mohamed-Chateauneuf, A. and Chaoui, K., 2006. Reliability assessment of underground pipelines under the combined effect of active corrosion and residual stress. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 83(2), pp.107-117.
Bai, M.R., Lan, S.S., and Huang, J.Y., 2018. Time difference of arrival (TDOA)-based acoustic source localization and signal extraction for intelligent audio classification. In 2018 IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), pp.632-636. IEEE.
Bai, Y. and Bai, Q., 2014. Subsea Pipeline Integrity and Risk Management. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford.
Banjara, N.K., Sasmal, S. and Voggu, S., 2020. Machine learning supported acoustic emission technique for leakage detection in pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 188, p.104243.
Bayat, B., Crasta, N., Crespi, A., Pascoal, A.M. and Ijspeert, A., 2017. Environmental monitoring using autonomous vehicles: a survey of recent searching techniques. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 45, pp.76-84.
Bie, H.Y., Ye, J.J. and Hao, Z.R., 2016. Effect of nozzle geometry on characteristics of submerged gas jet and bubble noise. Journal of Laboratory Automation, 21(5), pp.652-659.
Boyer, S.A., 2004. SCADA: Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition. John Wiley & Sons.
Campopiano, S., Cutolo, A., Cusano, A., Giordano, M., Parente, G., Lanza, G. and Laudati, A., 2009. Underwater acoustic sensors based on fiber Bragg gratings. Sensors, 9(6), pp.4446-4454.
Cawley, P., Lowe, M.J.S., Alleyne, D.N., Pavlakovic, B. and Wilcox, P., 2003. Practical long range guided wave inspection — applications to pipes and rail. Materials Evaluation, 61(1), pp.66-74.
Chang, S.E., McDaniels, T., Fox, J., Dhariwal, R. and Longstaff, H., 2014. Toward disaster-resilient cities: characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments. Risk Analysis, 34(3), pp.416-434.
Cosham, A. and Hopkins, P., 2002. The pipeline defect assessment manual. In International Pipeline Conference, Vol. 36207, pp.1565-1581.
Cranch, G.A., Nash, P.J. and Kirkendall, C.K., 2003. Large-scale remotely interrogated arrays of fiber-optic interferometric sensors for underwater acoustic applications. IEEE Sensors Journal, 3(1), pp.19-30.
Daley, T.M., Freifeld, B.M., Ajo-Franklin, J., Dou, S., Pevzner, R., Shulakova, V., Kashikar, S., Miller, D.E., Goetz, J., Henninges, J. and Lueth, S., 2013. Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring. The Leading Edge, 32(6), pp.699-706.
Dang, X., Ma, W., Habets, E.A. and Zhu, H., 2022. TDOA-based robust sound source localization with sparse regularization in wireless acoustic sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 30, pp.1108-1123.
Dann, M.R. and Huyse, L., 2018. The effect of inspection sizing uncertainty on the maximum corrosion growth in pipelines. Structural Safety, 70, pp.71-81.
Du, F., Li, C. and Wang, W., 2023. Development of subsea pipeline buckling, corrosion and leakage monitoring. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(1), p.188.
Eleftherakis, D. and Vicen-Bueno, R., 2020. Sensors to increase the security of underwater communication cables: A review of underwater monitoring sensors. Sensors, 20(3), p.737.
Etiope, G., Carnevale, P., Gasparoni, F., Calcara, M., Favali, P. and Smriglio, G., 2002. Off-shore hydrocarbon leakage: hazard and monitoring. Science-Technology Synergy for Research in the Marine Environment: Challenges for the XXI Century, pp.217-228.
Farghal, N.S., Saunders, J.K. and Parker, G.A., 2022. The potential of using fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) in earthquake early warning applications. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 112(3), pp.1416-1435.
Ferguson, B.G., Lo, K.W. and Rodgers, J.D., 2010. Sensing the underwater acoustic environment with a single hydrophone onboard an undersea glider. In OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY, pp.1-5. IEEE.
Foote, K.G., 2008. Underwater acoustic technology: review of some recent developments. OCEANS 2008, pp.1-6.
Garbatov, Y., Ås, S.K., Den Besten, H., Haselbach, P., Kahl, A., Karr, D., Kim, M.H., Liu, J., Lourenço de Souza, M.I., Mao, W. and Mikkola, E., 2022. Committee III.2: Fatigue and Fracture. In International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress. SNAME.
Gemeinhardt, H. and Sharma, J., 2023. Machine-learning-assisted leak detection using distributed temperature and acoustic sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(2), pp.1520-1531.
Ghazali, M.F., 2012. Leak detection using instantaneous frequency analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield.
Ghazali, M.F., Beck, S.B.M., Shucksmith, J.D., Boxall, J.B. and Staszewski, W.J., 2012. Comparative study of instantaneous frequency based methods for leak detection in pipeline networks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 29, pp.187-200.
Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover-Kapfer, P. and Jones, K.E., 2019. Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(2), pp.169-185.
Gillespie, D., Oswald, M., Hastie, G. and Sparling, C., 2022. Marine mammal HiCUP: A high current underwater platform for the long-term monitoring of fine-scale marine mammal behavior around tidal turbines. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, p.850446.
Giro, R.A., Bernasconi, G., Giunta, G. and Cesari, S., 2022. Jet noise characterization for advanced pipeline leak detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.13079.
Grieves, M. and Vickers, J., 2016. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. Springer, Cham, pp.85-113.
Grosse, C.U., 2009. Acoustic emission localization methods for large structures based on beam forming and array techniques. Proceedings of the NDTCE, 9.
Hartmann, D., Herz, M. and Wever, U., 2018. Model order reduction a key technology for digital twins. In Reduced-Order Modeling (ROM) for Simulation and Optimization. Springer, Cham, pp.167-179.
Hassan, F., Mahmood, A.K.B., Yahya, N., Saboor, A., Abbas, M.Z., Khan, Z. and Rimsan, M., 2021. State-of-the-art review on the acoustic emission source localization techniques. IEEE Access, 9, pp.101246-101266.
He, Z. and Liu, Q., 2021. Optical fiber distributed acoustic sensors: A review. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 39(12), pp.3671-3686.
Heydari, Z. and Mahabadi, A., 2023. Scalable real-time sound source localization method based on TDOA. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(15), pp.23333-23372.
Hovem, J.M., 2007. Underwater acoustics: Propagation, devices and systems. Journal of Electroceramics, 19(4), pp.339-347.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2014. ISO 55001: Asset Management — Management Systems — Requirements. ISO, Geneva.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2018. ISO 31000: Risk Management — Guidelines. ISO, Geneva.
Kishawy, H.A. and Gabbar, H.A., 2010. Review of pipeline integrity management practices. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 87(7), pp.373-380.
Larsen, O.N. and Radford, C., 2018. Acoustic conditions affecting sound communication in air and underwater. In Effects of Anthropogenic Noise on Animals. Springer New York, pp.109-144.
Liu, Y., Ning, P. and Reiter, M.K., 2011. False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 14(1), p.33.
Llor, J. and Malumbres, M.P., 2012. Underwater wireless sensor networks: how do acoustic propagation models impact the performance of higher-level protocols? Sensors, 12(2), pp.1312-1335.
Long, R., Cawley, P. and Lowe, M., 2003. Acoustic wave propagation in buried iron water pipes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 459(2039), pp.2749-2770.
Mahmoud, M.S. and Hamdan, M.M., 2018. Fundamental issues in networked control systems. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 5(5), pp.902-922.
Mahmutoglu, Y. and Turk, K., 2018. A passive acoustic based system to locate leak hole in underwater natural gas pipelines. Digital Signal Processing, 76, pp.59-65.
Malcher, F. and White, P., 2023. Acoustic monitoring techniques for subsea leak detection: A review of the literature.
Molenaar, M.M. and Cox, B.E., 2013. Field cases of hydraulic fracture stimulation diagnostics using fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) measurements and analyses. In the SPE Middle East Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition. SPE-164030.
Muhlbauer, W.K., 2004. Pipeline Risk Management Manual: Ideas, Techniques, and Resources. 3rd ed. Elsevier, Burlington.
Murad, M., Sheikh, A.A., Manzoor, M.A., Felemban, E. and Qaisar, S., 2015. A survey on current underwater acoustic sensor network applications. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 7(1), p.51.
Nsalo Kong, D.F., Shen, C., Tian, C., and Zhang, K., 2021. A new low-cost acoustic beamforming architecture for real-time marine sensing: Evaluation and design. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(8), p.868.
Pai, S., Yandon, E., and Moldoveanu, N., 2017. Marine seismic acquisition using autonomous marine vehicles towing 3D sensor arrays. In the Offshore Technology Conference. OTC.
Peng, Y., Tsouvalas, A., Stampoultzoglou, T. and Metrikine, A., 2021. Study of the sound escape with the use of an air bubble curtain in offshore pile driving. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(2), p.232.
Plotnikov, M.Y., Lavrov, V.S., Dmitraschenko, P.Y., Kulikov, A.V. and Meshkovskiy, I.K., 2019. Thin cable fiber-optic hydrophone array for passive acoustic surveillance applications. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(9), pp.3376-3382.
Preisig, J., 2007. Acoustic propagation considerations for underwater acoustic communications network development. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 11(4), pp.2-10.
Premus, V.E., Abbot, P.A., Kmelnitsky, V., Gedney, C.J., and Abbot, T.A., 2022. A wave glider-based, towed hydrophone array system for autonomous, real-time, passive acoustic marine mammal monitoring. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 152(3), pp.1814-1828.
Rahim, M.S., Nguyen, K.A., Stewart, R.A., Giurco, D., and Blumenstein, M., 2020. Machine learning and data analytic techniques in digital water metering: A review. Water, 12(1), p.294.
Rashid, S., Qaisar, S., Saeed, H. and Felemban, E., 2013. Performance analysis of wavelet transforms for leakage detection in long range pipeline networks. In 2013 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process & Control (ICSPC), pp.10-15. IEEE.
Ross, S.R.J., O'Connell, D.P., Deichmann, J.L., Desjonquères, C., Gasc, A., Phillips, J.N., Sethi, S.S., Wood, C.M. and Burivalova, Z., 2023. Passive acoustic monitoring provides a fresh perspective on fundamental ecological questions. Functional Ecology, 37(4), pp.959-975.
Rossi, M., Wisén, R., Vignoli, G. and Coni, M., 2022. Assessment of distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) performance for geotechnical applications. Engineering Geology, 306, p.106729.
Sharma, V., 2013. Vibro-acoustic monitoring of pipeline leakage and corrosion.
Shi, S., Huang, X., Rao, Z., Su, Z. and Hua, H., 2022. Numerical analysis on flow noise and structure-borne noise of fully appended SUBOFF propelled by a pump-jet. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 138, pp.140-158.
Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y. and Xu, L., 2016. Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5), pp.637-646.
Siddique, M.F., Ahmad, Z., Ullah, N. and Kim, J., 2023. A hybrid deep learning approach: Integrating short-time Fourier transform and continuous wavelet transform for improved pipeline leak detection. Sensors, 23(19), p.8079.
Stojanovic, M. and Preisig, J., 2009. Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(1), pp.84-89.
Sugai, L.S.M., Silva, T.S.F., Ribeiro Jr, J.W. and Llusia, D., 2019. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience, 69(1), pp.15-25.
Sundar, H., Sreenivas, T.V. and Seelamantula, C.S., 2018. TDOA-based multiple acoustic source localization without association ambiguity. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 26(11), pp.1976-1990.
Thodi, P., Khan, F. and Haddara, M., 2009. The selection of corrosion prior distributions for risk based integrity modeling. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(6), pp.793-809.
Ting, L.L., Tey, J.Y., Tan, A.C., King, Y.J. and Faidz, A.R., 2019. Improvement of acoustic water leak detection based on dual tree complex wavelet transform-correlation method. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 268, p.012025. IOP Publishing.
Tramontana, M., Gachagan, T., Nordon, A. and Littlejohn, D., 2011. The application of passive and active acoustic techniques in process monitoring. Doctoral dissertation, University of Strathclyde.
Ullah, N., Ahmed, Z. and Kim, J.M., 2023. Pipeline leakage detection using acoustic emission and machine learning algorithms. Sensors, 23(6), p.3226.
Van Parijs, S.M., Clark, C.W., Sousa-Lima, R.S., Parks, S.E., Rankin, S., Risch, D. and Van Opzeeland, I.C., 2009. Management and research applications of real-time and archival passive acoustic sensors over varying temporal and spatial scales. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 395, pp.21-36.
Van Walree, P.A., 2013. Propagation and scattering effects in underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(4), pp.614-631.
Vanijjirattikhan, R., Khomsay, S., Kitbutrawat, N., Khomsay, K., Supakchukul, U., Udomsuk, S., Suwatthikul, J., Oumtrakul, N. and Anusart, K., 2022. AI-based acoustic leak detection in water distribution systems. Results in Engineering, 15, p.100557.
Wang, Y., Liu, M., Zheng, P., Yang, H. and Zou, J., 2020. A smart surface inspection system using faster R-CNN in cloud-edge computing environment. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 43, p.101037.
Wegner, D.C., Damilola, O. and Omine, V., 2023. Sustainability and low-carbon transitions in offshore energy systems: a review of inspection and monitoring challenges.
Wegner, D.C., Nicholas, A.K., Odoh, O. and Ayansiji, K., 2021a. A machine learning-enhanced model for predicting pipeline integrity in offshore oil and gas fields. Journal of Pipeline Engineering.
Wegner, D.C., Omine, V. and Vincent, A., 2021b. A risk-based reliability model for offshore wind turbine foundations using underwater inspection data. Risk, 10, p.43.
Zhan, Z., 2020. Distributed acoustic sensing turns fiber-optic cables into sensitive seismic antennas. Seismological Research Letters, 91(1), pp.1-15.
Zhu, X.K. and Leis, B.N., 2012. Evaluation of burst pressure prediction models for line pipes. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 89, pp.85-97.
Zimmer, W.M., 2011. Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Cetaceans. Cambridge University Press.
