Hybrid Ism and Smart Methods for Selection of Shipping Expedition
Downloads
Shipping services play a crucial role in ensuring smooth operational processes and cost efficiency. This is particularly relevant for one of the manufacturing companies in Riau, a company engaged in the production of precast concrete using a make-to-order system. However, the selection of shipping services has so far been based solely on the experience of the purchasing department, without the application of clear criteria or prioritization systems. This has led to delays in material delivery, resulting in increased operational costs and failure to meet production targets. This study aims to provide the company with a method and relevant information for selecting an efficient and timely shipping service. This research will be using hybrid methods with Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). Through the ISM method, four key influential criteria were identified: cost, availability of delivery units (trucks), timeliness, and delivery coverage area. These criteria were then used in the SMART method to assess 11 shipping service providers. The analysis shows that the most recommended shipping service is Lancar Jaya, with a score of 97.09, while the least recommended is Cakra, with a score of 40.15. These findings are expected to serve as a reference for one of the manufacturing companies in Riau in determining effective shipping service providers.
Ardiansyah, M. F., & Wulandari, I. A. S. (2024). Penentuan Dalam Pemilihan Ekspedisi Menggunakan Metode Analytic Processes Network dan Dynamic Programming. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 6(2), 347-356.
Limantoro, C., Andi, A., & Rahardjo, J. (2023). Analisa Faktor Cost Overruns dengan Metode Interpretive Structural Modelling pada Beberapa Proyek Konstruksi di Indonesia. Dimensi Utama Teknik Sipil, 10(1), 20-37.
Gunawan, dkk. (2023). Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan. Yogyakarta: PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.
Amalia, M. N., & Ary, M. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Dengan Menggunakan SMART Pada CV. Hamuas Mandiri. Jurnal Sains dan Informatika p-ISSN, 2460, 173X.
Haryanti, dkk. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mustahik Zakat Dengan Menggunakan Analytical Network Process (AHP), Jawa Timur: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
R. Ginting and Alfredo, “Penentuan Supplier dengan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART),” Talent. Conf. Ser. Energy Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 116–123, 2020.
Cahya, A. S. R., & Prassetiyo, H. (2022). Usulan Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku Kabel dengan Menggunakan Metode Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) dan Analytical Network Process (ANP) di PT. KMS. e-Proceeding FTI.
Anshori, M. I., Moedjahedy, J., Anantadjaya, S. P. D., Ardimansyah, A., & Indriyani, S. (2022). Assessing the Relative Importance of Price, Safety, Energy Efficiency, Brand Reputation, and Warranty in Car Selection Using SMART Method as Decision Support System. Jinav Journal of Information and Visualization, 3(2), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.jinav1523
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G. K., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart Cities of the Future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349
Dube, A. S., & Gawande, R. S. (2016). Analysis of Green Supply Chain Barriers Using Integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC Approach. Benchmarking an International Journal, 23(6), 1558–1578. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2015-0057
Gleason, N. W. (2018). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
Hamed, T., & Mohebi, A. (2024). Using SMART Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Applications, Advantages, and Limitations. Archives of Advanced Engineering Science, 2(4), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewaaes42022765
Hermawan, I. (2021). The Impact of Industrial Revolution 4.0 on Indonesian Export and Welfare: Food and Beverage Case. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210121.050
Hu, K., Chia, K.-C., Lu, M., & Liang, Y.-L. (2021). Using Importance–performance Analysis, Goal Difficulty and the Kano Model to Prioritize Improvements in the Quality of Home Delivery Logistics Services. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(2), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-12-2020-0491
KHAN, M. D. R. I. (2025). Optimizing Transportation Costs in Supply Chains Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming: A Comprehensive Approach for Logistics Efficiency. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7210390/v1
Kumar, S., Gorane, S., & Kant, R. (2015). Modelling the Supplier Selection Process Enablers Using ISM and Fuzzy MICMAC Approach. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 30(5), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-01-2013-0012
Marendra, A. B., Nugroho, D. G., & Prabowo, I. A. (2019). Klasifikasi Pemain Futsal Menggunakan Metode Simple Multi Attributte Rating Technique (SMART). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi (Tikomsin), 6(2).
https://doi.org/10.30646/tikomsin.v6i2.377
Nitami, D., Rianti, E., & Pratiwi, M. (2024). Decision Support System Using the SMART Method in Determining the Status of Contract Employees From Permanent Employees. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 72–77.
https://doi.org/10.35134/jcsitech.v10i3.105
ÖZAYDIN, N. G. G., & GÜÇLÜOĞULLARI, E. (2015). Typologies of Freight Forwarding Service Failures and Recovery Strategies. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 3(2), 25–25.
https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.21478082.2015.3/2.25-54
Peng, X., & Lu, G. (2017). Exploring the Impact of Delivery Performance on Customer Transaction Volume and Unit Price: Evidence From an Assembly Manufacturing Supply Chain. Production and Operations Management, 26(5), 880–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12682
Pratama, R. A., & Hardianto, R. (2024). Permanent Employee Assessment Decision Support System Using the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 50–54.
https://doi.org/10.35134/jcsitech.v10i2.100
Reiner, G., Teller, C., & Kotzab, H. (2013). Analyzing the Efficient Execution of In‐Store Logistics Processes in Grocery Retailing—The Case of Dairy Products. Production and Operations Management, 22(4), 924–939.
https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12003
Rocha-Lona, L., & Chávez, J. L. (2023). Disruptive Technologies and Implications for Business Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.46254/ev01.20230200
Roy, R., Lampert, C. M., & Stoyneva, I. (2018). When Dinosaurs Fly: The Role of Firm Capabilities in the ‘Avianization’ of Incumbents During Disruptive Technological Change. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(2), 261–284.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1278
Setiawan, W., Pranoto, N., & Huda, K. (2020). Employee Performance Evaluation Decision Support System With the SMART (Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique) Method. Jurnal Resti (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 4(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v4i1.1384
