Zero-Knowledge Proofs For Privacy-Preserving Systems: A Survey Across Blockchain, Identity, And Beyond
Downloads
The cryptographic protocol developments are transforming digital trust is the capacity to verify without revealing any underlying information. Traditional authentication and authorization systems are usually prone to leakage of sensitive data, resulting in compromise of privacy and low scalability in distributed systems. The root of these problems is eliminated through the so-called zero-knowledge techniques that allow demonstrating to one party ownership of some information without exposing it. This paper explores the origin and development of zero-knowledge protocols in light of its efficiency, trustless design, and privacy focus to illustrate why the application is worth the hype. Particular attention is paid to such structures as zk-SNARKs, zk-STARKs, and bulletproofs, as well as their application to constructing transparent, scalable systems. Blockchain aptitudes used anywhere in confidentiality of transactions, decentralized identity systems allow a self-sovereign identity without exaggerating personal information, and the healthcare and finance industries enjoy the ability to share information securely without any effect on compliance aspects. The next discussion points are implementations, the scalability issue, cryptographic assumptions, and integration issues. This survey outlines evaluations of deployments from 2021 to 2025 to determine the following top benefits, barriers, and trends in building systems that safeguard privacy without compromising their performance or trust to the client. Future requirement conclusions provide some insights about future requirements in terms of efficient construction of proofs, standardizations, and ease of usability to expand the adoption of infrastructures built on zero-knowledge into a constantly more integrated digital world.
N. K. Prajapati, “Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Cybersecurity: A Review on Secure Threat Detection,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Commun. Technol., pp. 520–528, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.48175/IJARSCT-25168.
A. Goyal, “Optimizing Project Timelines with Strategic Vendor Management and Blockchain-Enabled LEAP Collaboration,” Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 94–100, 2023.
W. Shalannanda, “Using Zero-Knowledge Proof in Privacy-Preserving Networks,” 2023, pp. 1–6.
doi: 10.1109/TSSA59948.2023.10367041.
A. Satybaldy and M. Nowostawski, “Review of techniques for privacy-preserving blockchain systems,” BSCI 2020 - Proc. 2nd ACM Int. Symp. Blockchain Secur. Crit. Infrastructure, Co-located with AsiaCCS 2020, pp. 1–9, 2020,
doi: 10.1145/3384943.3409416.
S. Pandya, “Advanced Blockchain-Based Framework for Enhancing Security, Transparency, and Integrity in Decentralised Voting System,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Commun. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 865–876, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.48175/IJARSCT-12467H.
R. Lavin, X. Liu, H. Mohanty, L. Norman, G. Zaarour, and B. Krishnamachari, “A Survey on the Applications of Zero-Knowledge Proofs,” pp. 1–81, 2024.
V. Prajapati, “Blockchain-Based Decentralized Identity Systems: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Interoperability,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1011–1020, Mar. 2025,
doi: 10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1062.
A. Goyal, “Integrating Blockchain for Vendor Coordination and Agile Scrum in Efficient Project Execution,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., vol. 9, no. 12, 2024.
B. O. Roelink, M. El‐Hajj, and D. Sarmah, “Systematic review: Comparing zk‐SNARK, zk‐STARK, and bulletproof protocols for privacy‐preserving authentication,” Secur. Priv., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1–59, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1002/spy2.401.
L. Zhou, A. Diro, A. Saini, S. Kaisar, and P. C. Hiep, “Leveraging zero knowledge proofs for blockchain-based identity sharing: A survey of advancements, challenges and opportunities,” J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 80, pp. 1–20, Feb. 2024,
doi: 10.1016/j.jisa.2023.103678.
S. M. R. Motlagh, C. Pahl, H. R. Barzegar, and N. El Ioini, “A Comparative Evaluation of Zero Knowledge Proof Techniques,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security, SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2025, pp. 237–244.
doi: 10.5220/0013269100003944.
L. Herskind, P. Katsikouli, and N. Dragoni, “Privacy and Cryptocurrencies - A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 54044–54059, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980950.
S. Pandya, “A Systematic Review of Blockchain Technology Use in Protecting and Maintaining Electronic Health Records,” Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev., vol. 8, no. 4, 2021.
G. Modalavalasa, “Advanced Blockchain Mechanisms for Strengthening Data Security and Ensuring Privacy in Decentralized Systems,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Sci. Manag., vol. 8, no. 6, 2023.
H. Jin, Y. Luo, P. Li, and J. Mathew, “A Review of Secure and Privacy-Preserving Medical Data Sharing,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 61656–61669, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916503.
H. Yin, Y. Zhu, G. Guo, and W. C.-C. Chu, “Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts for Confidential Transactions Using Dual-Mode Broadcast Encryption,” IEEE Trans. Reliab., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 1090–1103, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TR.2023.3328146.
P. Chatterjee, “Blockchain Technology as the Backbone of Fintech Innovation : Opportunities and Challenges,” vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 798–810, 2023.
B. Zhang et al., “A Blockchain and Zero Knowledge Proof Based Data Security Transaction Method in Distributed Computing,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 21, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13214260.
J. Watkins, “Zero-Knowledge Proof Techniques for Enhanced Privacy and Scalability in Blockchain Systems,” in IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, 2025, pp. 1–10.
T. Burns, J. C. Dr, and F. Doyle, “A Review of Interoperability Standards for Industry 4.0.,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 38, pp. 646–653, 2019,
doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.083.
S. M. M, N. S. Kumar, and R. K. Devi, “A Privacy-Preserving Route Verification Framework Using Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Blockchain in Inter-Domain Routing,” in 2025 8th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), IEEE, Apr. 2025, pp. 660–667.
doi: 10.1109/ICOEI65986.2025.11013246.
X. Zhou, B. Wang, H. Zhao, H. Sun, Q. Guo, and B. Chen, “Incentivized Coordinated Heat-Electricity-Gas Dispatch: A Zero Knowledge Proof-Based Solution Considering Privacy and Anti-Forgery,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 713–725, 2024,
doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2023.3295086.
D. Mackic and M. Antic, “Managing IoT Data Transmission in Smart Home Environments with Zero-Knowledge Proof Protocol,” in 2024 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC), 2024, pp. 134–137.
doi: 10.1109/ZINC61849.2024.10579339.
M. Ahmadi and R. Nourmohammadi, “zkFDL: An efficient and privacy-preserving decentralized federated learning with zero knowledge proof,” in 2024 IEEE 3rd International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC), 2024, pp. 1–10.
doi: 10.1109/ICAIC60265.2024.10433831.
D. Naidu, B. Wanjari, R. Bhojwani, S. Suchak, R. Baser, and N. K. Ray, “Efficient Smart contract for Privacy Preserving Authentication in Blockchain using Zero Knowledge Proof,” in 2023 OITS International Conference on Information Technology (OCIT), 2023, pp. 969–974.
doi: 10.1109/OCIT59427.2023.10430710.
D. Hou, J. Zhang, S. Huang, Z. Peng, J. Ma, and X. Zhu, “Privacy-Preserving Energy Trading Using Blockchain and Zero Knowledge Proof,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), 2022, pp. 412–418.
doi: 10.1109/Blockchain55522.2022.00064.
