The Critical Components of an Integrated Decision Making Framework for Enhancing Post Destruction Reconstruction
Downloads
Post destruction reconstruction of the built environment is a critical process that demands a balance between immediate recovery needs and long term sustainability. Although speed is frequently given priority over quality due to necessity of rebuilding, the lack of integrated decision making frameworks has led to disjointed efforts, insufficient resources and lesser ideal results. This systematical review investigates the critical components required to develop an integrated decision making framework targeted for post destruction reconstruction of the built environment. Pakistan faces frequent and swear natural disasters due to its geographic and climate conditions, including earthquakes, floods and droughts. Recent events such as the 2022 flood that affected over 33 million people, have exposed the vulnerabilities of the country’s disaster management systems. Using a harsh methodology, this study examined peer-reviewed literature from 2010 to 2024, focusing on challenges, strategies and tools in reconstruction efforts. Key findings reveal the importance of three interconnected components that are stakeholder collaboration, technological integration and sustainability considerations. Stakeholder engagement fosters inclusivity and aligns priorities across governments, communities, and private organisations. Technological tools such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) enhance planning and operational efficiency. Sustainability principles emphasize resilience through the use of energy efficient designs, environmentally friendly materials, and disaster resilient construction techniques. This review contributes in filling the gaps in the existing frameworks by synthesizing evidence and proposing actionable recommendations and also examines how an integrated decision making framework can enhance Pakistan's disaster response and reconstruction capabilities ensuring sustainability and Resilience. The insights aim to assist policy makers, urban planners, and reconstruction practitioners in improving recovery outcomes.
Adaji, A., Mohamed, S., Ebenehi, I., Guma, E., & Onuvava, M. (2019). Stakeholders in Post Disaster Housing Reconstruction (PDHR): Meaning, Classification, and Benefits. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 3, 27–32. Retrieved from https://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/IJAMR190706.pdf
Adamy, A., Bakar, A. H. A., & Razak, A. A. (2019). Evaluation of Handover Practice in Post-disaster Reconstruction in Aceh Province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 620, 012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/620/1/012071
Afkhamiaghda, M., & Elwakil, E. (2022). Challenges review of decision making in post-disaster construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2061751
Bakic, H., & Ajdukovic, D. (2021). Resilience after natural disasters: the process of harnessing resources in communities differentially exposed to a flood. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1891733
Ballash, G. A., Lee, S., Mollenkopf, D. F., Mathys, D. A., Albers, A. L., Sechrist, E., … Wittum, T. E. (2020). Pulsed electric field application reduces carbapenem- and colistin-resistant microbiota and blaKPC spread in urban wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110529
Baroudi, B., & R. Rapp, R. (2014). Stakeholder management in disaster restoration projects. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-07-2012-0021
Blocker, C. (2023, May 4). The Disaster Resilience Framework: A Tool to Promote Foresight and Accountability - INTOSAI Journal. Retrieved December 26, 2024, from INTOSAI Journal website: https://intosaijournal.org/journal-entry/the-disaster-resilience-framework-a-tool-to-promote-foresight-and-accountability/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cao, Y., Xu, C., Aziz, N. M., & Kamaruzzaman, S. N. (2023). BIM–GIS Integrated Utilization in Urban Disaster Management: The Contributions, Challenges, and Future Directions. Remote Sensing, 15(5), 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051331
Disaster Management Flowchart Images, Photos | Mungfali. (2018). Retrieved December 26, 2024, from Mungfali website:
https://mungfali.com/explore/Disaster-Management-Flowchart
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A Typology of reviews: an Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Guo, D., Cao, Z., DeFrancia, K., Yeo, J. W. G., Hardadi, G., & Chai, S. (2018). Awareness, perceptions and determinants of urban sustainable development concerns - Evidence from a central province in China. Sustainable Development, 26(6), 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1734
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction | Vol 95, September 2023 | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier. (2023). Retrieved December 25, 2024, from Sciencedirect.com website: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/international-journal-of-disaster-risk-reduction/vol/95/suppl/C
Ismail, F. Z., Halog, A., & Smith, C. (2017). How sustainable is disaster resilience? International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(5), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-07-2016-0028
Jazmín, A., & Guzmán, D. (n.d.). BIM and GIS Integration for Disaster-Prone Environ- ments: The Case Study of Post-Earthquake Recon- struction in Mexico City with a specialization SUSTAINABLE BUILDING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT. Retrieved from https://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1792944/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Kerle, N., Ghaffarian, S., Nawrotzki, R., Leppert, G., & Lech, M. (2019). Evaluating Resilience-Centered Development Interventions with Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 11(21), 2511. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212511
Khan, A. N., & Jan, M. A. (2014). Community Based Disaster Risk Management in Pakistan. Disaster Risk Reduction, 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55369-4_19
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. M. (2007, January). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering | Request PDF. Retrieved from ResearchGate website: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302924724_Guidelines_for_performing_Systematic_Literature_Reviews_in_Software_Engineering
Mavi, R. K., Gengatharen, D., Mavi, N. K., Hughes, R., Campbell, A., & Yates, R. (2021). Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(4), 1932. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041932
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … McGuinness, L. A. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pakistan Floods 2022: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) | United Nations Development Programme. (2022, October 28). Retrieved from UNDP website: https://www.undp.org/pakistan/publications/pakistan-floods-2022-post-disaster-needs-assessment-pdna
Pakistan floods 2022: Post-disaster needs assessment | UNDP Climate Promise. (2020, December 12). Retrieved December 26, 2024, from UNDP Climate Promise website: https://climatepromise.undp.org/research-and-reports/pakistan-floods-2022-post-disaster-needs-assessment
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (M. Petticrew & H. Roberts, Eds.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Puri, A., Elkharboutly, M., & Naseem Ameer Ali. (2024). Identifying major challenges in managing post-disaster reconstruction projects: A critical analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 104491–104491.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104491
Rashmi Sanchaniya, Nithya Somrajan, & Ineta Geipele. (2023). Problems and Possible Solutions of Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction Projects in India. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 11(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2023-0004
Rose, A. (2011). Resilience and sustainability in the face of disasters. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 96–100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.003
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., & Nipa, T. J. (2020). Exploratory analysis of barriers to effective post-disaster recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101735
Sertyesilisik, B. (2017). Building Information Modeling as a Tool for Enhancing Disaster Resilience of the Construction Industry. TRANSACTIONS of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Safety Engineering Series, 12(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/tvsbses-2017-0002
Shah, I., Mahmood, T., Khan, S. A., Elahi, N., Shahnawaz, M., Dogar, A. A., … Begum, K. (2022). Inter-agency collaboration and disaster management: A case study of the 2005 earthquake disaster in pakistan. Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1).
https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1088
Shi, M., Cao, Q., Ran, B., & Wei, L. (2021). A Conceptual Framework Integrating “Building Back Better” and Post-Earthquake Needs for Recovery and Reconstruction. Sustainability, 13(10), 5608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105608
Terblanche, T., De Sousa, L. O., & Van Niekerk, D. (2022). Disaster resilience framework indicators for a city’s disaster resilience planning strategy. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1264
The World Bank. (2018). Overview. Retrieved from World Bank website:
https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disasterriskmanagement/overview
United Nations. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Retrieved from https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf
World Bank. (2022, October 28). Pakistan: Flood Damages and Economic Losses Over USD 30 billion and Reconstruction Needs Over USD 16 billion - New Assessment. Retrieved from World Bank website:
