Load and Deflection Analysis of Different Beam
Downloads
In this study, experimental analysis of various beam which were strengthened with the use of GFRP laminates was carried out and after that the result were compared with the non-strengthened beam called control beam. Three types of beam were casted, out of which two were rectangular beam and one was T-beam. Each type of beam has three specimens and among them one was un- strengthened and two were strengthened beam specimen. After the test results were obtained following conclusions can be made in all the set of beam it was clear that the ultimate load carrying capacity of Control Beam was lesser than that of strengthened beams. In strengthened beams Initial flexural cracks were visible at much higher load as compared to control beam. The load carrying capacity of the U shape Jacket wrapping of beam with laminates was found to be maximum of all the beams. For third set of beam i.e. T-beams it enhances the load to about 40% greater than control beam TB1 and nearly 12% greater than beam strengthened with FRP at the soffit only i.e. TB2.
Hool, George A.; Johnson, Nathan Clarke(1920). "Elements of Structural Theory - Definitions". Handbook of Building Construction (Google Books).vol. 1 (1sted.).New York McGraw-Hill. p. 2. Retrieved 2008-10-01. "A cantilever beam is a beam having one end rigidly fixed and the other end free."
Timoshenko, S., (1953), History of strength of materials, McGraw-Hill New York. ANSYS.11.0 documentation.
Strang, Gilbert; Fix, George (1973). An Analysis of The Finite Element Method. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-032946-0.
Timoshenko, S.P. and D.H. Young. Elements of Strength of Materials, 5thedition. (MKS System).
Babuška, Ivo; Banerjee, Uday; Osborn, John E. (June 2004). "Generalized Finite Element Methods: Main Ideas, Results, and Perspective". International Journal of Computational Methods 1 (1): 67–103.
doi:10.1142/S0219876204000083].
E.A. Witmer (1991-1992). "Elementary Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory". MIT Unified Engineering Course Notes.
Ballarini, Roberto (April 18, 2003). "The Da Vinci-Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory?". Mechanical Engineering Magazine Online. Retrieved 2006-07-22.
Truesdell, C., (1960), The rational mechanics of flexible or elastic bodies 1638- 1788, VenditioniExponuntOrellFussliTurici.
Gargi Majumdar., (2013) “Deflection and stress analysis of cantilever beam and its validation using ANSYS”.International Journal of Mechanical engg. ISSN 2249-OO19, Vol. 3. PP. 655 – 662.
Bellagundu; (2002) “Finite element in engineering”, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall India.
Khurmi, R. S.; Gupta, J. K.; (1999) “A textbook of Machine Design” EPH Publication.
Satphy S.M.;(2014)” A project of dynamic analysis of cantilever beam & its experimental validation”, Dept. of Mech. Engg., National institute of Technology, Rourkela.
A.Kursun, M.TunayCertin; (2014) “Elastic Stress analysis of composite cantilever beam loaded uniformly”, Intenational Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial and Mechatronics Engineering. Vol;8, No:2.
K.Vijaykumar ;(2014) “Tungsten Cantilever Beam using Ansys, (Model Analysis)”,IJES, ISSN 2319-1813 Volume 3, P.P .53-59
TarsicioBelendez; (2003) “Numerical and Experimental Analysis of a Cantilever Beam; a Laboratory project to Introduce Geometric Nonlinearity in Mechanics of Material”, Int.J.Engg.Ed, vol.19,No.6,P.P 885-892.
