Utilization of Anaerobic Co-Digestion for Biogas Production for Institutional Cooking: A Case of Nkumbi International College
Downloads
Studies have linked the use of wood fuel to deforestation leading to greenhouse gas emissions which cause climate change. Despite these concerns, some institutions located in the rural areas of Zambia like boarding schools and colleges still use firewood as a fuel for cooking and heating. Additionally, electricity, where available, is usually based on fossil fuel combustion, and often has high tariffs if connected to the national electricity grid and is also unreliable. On the other hand, biogas produced from animal and other organic wastes has demonstrated to be a cleaner alternative source of energy that can be used for cooking and supply of heat.
A case of Nkumbi international college was selected to consider the economic viability of using the animal and agriculture waste from the institutional farm as a feedstock in an anaerobic co-digester to generate biogas for use as fuel for cooking to replace firewood and grid electricity, the current sources of energy for cooking. Results showed that installing a biogas system at the college and using the biogas to replace a combination of firewood and electricity is highly viable with a positive net present value of USD 19,747, a payback period of 3.1 years, and an internal rate of return of 35.5% over a period of 20 years.
Anaerobic Digestion.Com (2016). "Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion." Plants in Africa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling: 55, 63-57.
Bernd Althusmann, S. B. (2016). Perspectives on energy security and renewable energies in Subsaharan Africa. Windhoek, Namibia, Macmillan Education Namibia.
Biotech (2016). Renewable Energy. National Algal Bio fuels Technology Review
Banks C. (2009) Optimizing Anaerobic Digestion. Evaluating the Potential for AD to provide Energy and Soil Management. niversity of Southampton.
Chen Y., Yang G., Sweeney S. and Feng Y. (2010). Household Biogas Use in Rural China: A Study of Opportunities and Constraints Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: 14, 545-549.
CIMAC (2015). "Impact of gas quality on gas engine performance."
Claus Von Mitzlaff (1988). "Energies for biogas." Theory, modification economic operations. (GTZ) Gmb
Denis Debila (2011). In der Entwicklungshilfe scheitern viele Projekte, weil sie zu wenig Rücksicht auf die Umstände vor Ort nehmen. Ein Verein ehrenamtlich tätiger Technik-Profis hat daraus Lehren gezogen. Deutschland.
Deogratias K., Quais H., Soundar K., Goudong S. (2015) Integrating data analytics and simulation meyhods to support manufactutring decision making. Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, Huntington Beach, California.
Dobre P. et al (2014). "Main factors affecting biogas production - an overview." 19(3).
Energypedia.info (2016). "Electricity Generation from Biogas."
Dolores Hidolgo, Martin-Marroquín J. M., Coronas F. (20160). Biogas upgrading technologies
ERB (2014). Energy Sector Report 2014. Zambia, ERB: 8.
Feiges S (2015) Climate change mitigation and adaptation potential of basic energy services: Overview of potential heating and decentralized electricity generation. GIZ, 14.2242.7-001.00, Zurich, Switzerland.
Foundation, U. N. (2013). ACHIEVING UNIVERSAL ENERGY ACCESS.
G. W. Roth, A. J. H. (2016). "Corn silage production and management." 6.
Georg Friedl (2016). Biogas production in Germany: Status quo and future trends.
Hahn h, K. b., Wachendor M., (2014). "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews."
