The Effect of Sintering Temperature on Graphene Oxide Reinforced Copper Matrix Composite Fabricated Through Powder Metallurgy Technique
Downloads
Composite materials revolutionize engineering, seamlessly blending diverse components for enhanced strength and versatility. These advanced structures, combining fibers and matrices, redefine traditional material boundaries. Their lightweight yet robust nature propels innovation across industries, from aerospace to automotive. Embracing composites heralds a new era of design possibilities and heightened performance. The work has been carried out by the bulk Cu/GO sintered composite's microstructure, grain development, and texture are examined to the sintering temperatures. The copper/graphene oxide (Cu/GO) composite is made using the powder metallurgy approach, which uses fine Cu particles as the matrix. The consequences of sintering for one hour at a different temperature > 600 Celsius are to be examined. According to the study, GO limits inhibit grain growth during sintering. Additionally, because of the varying rates of grain formation, sintered composites have irregular texture. The composite reaches its maximum hardness when sintered at different temperatures. The mechanical characteristics of the composite are observed as the sintering temperature increases and Cu/GO sintered has influenced the density, porosity, and hardness.
Alaneme, KK & Aluko, AO 2012, ‘Production and age-hardening behaviour of borax premixed SiC reinforced Al-Mg-Si alloy composites developed by double stir-casting technique’, West Indian J Eng., vol. 34, no. 1–2, pp. 80–5.
Tjong SC (2013) Recent progress in the development and properties of novel metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets. Mater Sci Eng R 74:281–350
Bakshi SR, Lahiri D, Agarwal A (2010) Carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites—a review. Int Mater Rev 55:41–64
Singh V, Joung D, Zhai L, Das S, Khondaker SI, Seal S (2011) Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Prog Mater Sci 56:1178–1271
Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, Novoselov KS (2012) The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 71:1459–1476
Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2017) Mechanical properties of graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 90:75–127
Kumar HGP, Xavior MA (2014) Graphene reinforced metal matrix composites (GRMMC): a review. Procedia Eng 97:1033–1040
Ovid’ko IA (2014) Metal-graphene nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical properties: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 38:190–200
Hu Z, Tong G, Lin D, Chen C, Guo H, Xu J, Zhou L (2016) Graphene-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites—a review. Mater Sci Technol 32:930–953
Sadowski P, Kowalczyk-Gajewska K, Stupkiewicz S (2015) Classical estimates of the effective thermoelastic properties of copper–graphene composites. Compos Part B Eng 80:278–290Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems.