EEDI Analysis for Trimaran Feeder at Maluku Waters
Downloads
The international maritime organization (IMO) has worked since 2009 to minimize harmful gas emissions from marine traffic. Due to its worldwide climate effect, IMO has implemented an energy efficiency design index (EEDI) to monitor and quantify CO2 emissions. Due to 1.0-meter wave height, Maluku waters remain quiet. For transporting from distant, outermost, and border places, feeder ships will work better. The three-body vessel (trimaran) has a vast deck surface and can efficiently feed tiny islands. This study analyzes trimaran vessel EEDI and resistance using Froude number Fr = 0.21 speed and transverse distance S/L = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5. Experimental calculations show a large fluctuation in hull distance. The trimaran ships with S/L=0.5 have the least resistance and essentially equal calculation results to independent trimarans. This shows that the trimaran with a 0.5 hull ratio has little hull interference. For trimaran ships, EEDI estimates suggest operating below Fr=0.21, which meets IMO criteria.
[UNCTAD, Reveiw of Maritime Transport. 2018. [Online].Available: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2018_en.pdf
C. Nunex, “Carbon dioxide levels are at a record high. Here’s what you need to know.,” Natl. Geogr. Mag., pp. 1–15, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/greenhouse-gases/#close
IMO, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” no. January 2013, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/GHG-Emissions.aspx
IMO, “Roadmap For Developing A Comprehensive IMO Strategy On Reduction Of GHG Emissions From Ships-MEPC 70/18/Add.1-Annex 22,” no. January 2019, p. 6, 2021.
C. Singhal and A. Dev, “SEEMP: Energy Management and the Shipping Industry,” 2013, pp. 69–75.
doi: 10.3850/978-981-07-7338-0_OSV2013-06.
IMO, “IMO Train the Trainer (TTT) Course on Energy Efficient Ship Operation,” Int. Marit. Organ., no. January, pp. 1–59, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Documents/Air pollution/M2 EE regulations and guidelines final.pdf
A. Tokuslu, “Energy Efficiency of a Passenger Ship in Turkey,” Sci. Bull. Nav. Acad., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.21279/1454-864X-20-I1-002.
E. Lindstad, G. S. Eskeland, A. Rialland, and A. Valland, “Decarbonizing Maritime Transport: The Importance of Engine Technology and Regulations for LNG to Serve as a Transition Fuel,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 8793, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12218793.
A. Farkas, N. Degiuli, I. Martić, and M. Vujanović, “Greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential by using antifouling coatings in a maritime transport industry,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 295, p. 126428, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.126428.
N. Degiuli, I. Martić, A. Farkas, and I. Gospić, “The impact of slow steaming on reducing CO2 emissions in the Mediterranean Sea,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 8131–8141, Nov. 2021,
doi: 10.1016/J.EGYR.2021.02.046.
M. A. Nepomuceno de Oliveira, A. Szklo, and D. A. Castelo Branco, “Implementation of Maritime Transport Mitigation Measures according to their marginal abatement costs and their mitigation potentials,” Energy Policy, vol. 160, p. 112699, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2021.112699.
A. F. Molland, S. R. Turnock, D. A. Hudson, and I. K. A. P. Utama, “Reducing Ship Emissions: A Review of Potential Practical Improvements in the Propulsive Efficiency of Future Ships,” Int. J. Marit. Eng., vol. 156, no. A2, p. 175, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.3940/rina.ijme.2014.a2.289.
A. F. Molland, S. R. Turnock, and D. A. Hudson, hip Resistance and Propulsion: Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power 2nd Edition, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. doi: 10.1017/9781316494196.
R. B. Luhulima, Sutiyo, and I. K. A. P. Utama, “An Investigation into The Correlation Between Resistance and Seakeeping Characteristics of Trimaran at Various Configuration and with Particular Case in Connection with Energy Efficiency,” Proc. Int. Symp. Mar. Eng. Oct. 15-19, 2017, Tokyo, Japan, 2017.
R. B. Luhulima, D. Setyawan, and I. K. A. P. Utama, “Selecting Monohull, Catamaran and Trimaran as Suitable Passenger Vessels Based on Stability and Seakeeping Criteria,” in The 14th International Ship Stability Workshop (ISSW), 2014, pp. 29 September–01 October 2014, Malaysia.
N. Degiuli, A. Werner, and I. Zotti, “An Experimental Investigation into The Resistance Components of Trimaran Configurations,” in International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Russia, 2005.
A. Farkas, N. Degiuli, and I. Martić, “Numerical investigation into the interaction of resistance components for a series 60 catamaran,” Ocean Eng., vol. 146, pp. 151–169, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2017.09.043.
I. K. A. P. Utama, W. D. Aryawan, A. Nasirudin, Sutiyo, and Yanuar, “Numerical Investigation into the Pressure and Flow Velocity Distributions of a Slender-Body Catamaran Due to Viscous Interference Effects,” Int. J. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 149, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v12i1.4269.
J. Hu, Y. Zhang, P. Wang, and F. Qin, “NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESISTANCE OF ASYMMETRIC CATAMARAN WITH DIFFERENT LAYOUTS,” vol. 71, p. 2020, doi: 10.21278/brod71206.
K. Uithof, P. G. van Oossanen, and F. Bergsma, “The Feasibility And Performance Of A Trimaran Yacht Concept Equipped With A Hull Vane,” Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 2015, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0625.
