Analyzing the Relationship between Free Locally Convex Spaces and Nuclear Space Concepts
Downloads
The exploration of Free Locally Convex Spaces (FLCS) and nuclear spaces is a crucial component of functional analysis. Extensive research has been conducted on the interplay between FLCS and nuclear spaces. A significant finding in this field is that every nuclear space qualifies as a FLCS. Furthermore, the examination of specific categories of FLCS reveals that the connections between these two types of spaces can enhance our understanding of their individual characteristics and applications. Conversely, there are numerous unresolved questions and potential avenues for future research regarding free locally convex spaces and nuclear spaces. One intriguing challenge is to identify instances of FLCS that do not fall under the category of nuclear spaces. Another promising direction involves investigating the relationships between FLCS and other forms of generalized locally convex spaces, such as bornological spaces. Additionally, the role of FLCS and nuclear spaces in the realms of non-commutative geometry and operator algebras continues to be a vibrant area of inquiry. This paper seeks to present a comprehensive overview of these concepts and their interrelations.
Arens, R. D. “Banach algebras.” American Mathematical Society, 1968.
Grothendieck, A. “Produitstensorielstopologiques de suites d’espacestopologiques et applications aux cohomologiesprojectives.” Inst. HautesÉtudes Sci. Publ Math. 3, 18-56 (1955).
Schwartz, L. “Topologie et continuitédans les espacesvectoriels à topologieconvexe.” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 24, 5-66 (1965).
Kothe, G. “Introduction to Banach spaces. I.” Springer Science & Business Media, 1969.
Riesz, F., &Sz.-Nagy, B. “Functional Analysis.” Springer Science & Business Media, 1990.
Boothby, W. “Topology and Geometry: An Introduction through Examples.” Springer Science & Business Media, 2002.
Pedersen, G. K. “Analysis and Geometry on Banach Spaces and Manifolds.” Cambridge University Press, 2010.
L. Außenhofer, “Free nuclear groups”, Topology Appl. 134 (2007), 90–102.
M. Fabian, P. Habala, P. H´ajek, V. Montesinos, V. Zizler, “Banach Space Theory. The Basis for Linear and Nonlinear Analysis”, CMS Books in Mathematics, Springer, 2011.
V. P. Fonf, W. B. Johnson, A. M. Plichko, V. V. Shevchyk, “Covering a compact set in a Banach Space by an operator range of a Banach space with basis”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), No. 4, 1421–1434.
J. T. Joichi, “Normed linear spaces equivalent to inner product spaces”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.17 (1966), 423–426.
M. G. Megrelishvili, “Fragmentability and continuity of semigroup actions”, Semigroup Forum 57 (1998), 101–126.
O. G. Okunev, “A method for constructing examples of M-equivalent spaces”, Topology Appl. 36 (1990), 157–171.
H. H. Schaefer, “Topological Vector Spaces”, Macmillan Company, N.Y., 1966.
M. G. Tkachenko, “On completeness of free abelian topological groups”, Soviet Math. Dokl. 27 (1983), 341–345.
V. V. Tkachuk, “Weakly linearly Lindel¨of spaces revisited”, Topology Appl. 256 (2019), 128–135.
V. V. Uspenskij, “Free topological groups of metrizable spaces”, Math. USSR-Izv. 37 (1991), 657– 680.
V. V. Uspenskij, “Unitary representability of free abelian topological groups”, Applied General Topology 9 (2008), No. 2, 197–204. arXiv: math.RT/060425.
