Decentralized Architectures: A Paradigm for Scalable, Fault-Tolerant, and Efficient Distributed Systems
Downloads
The topic "Decentralized Architectures: A Paradigm for Scalable, Fault-Tolerant, and Efficient Distributed Systems" explores the foundational principles and advantages of decentralized architectures in the context of distributed systems. In essence, decentralized architectures represent a paradigm shift in designing systems that offer scalability, fault tolerance, and efficiency.
Scalability is addressed through the distribution of computing tasks across a network of nodes, allowing the system to handle increasing workloads by adding more nodes. This modular approach enables seamless expansion without compromising performance. Additionally, fault tolerance is achieved by decentralizing control, reducing the impact of individual node failures on the overall system. This robustness enhances system reliability and ensures uninterrupted operation, crucial in mission-critical applications.
Efficiency is a key focus, as decentralized architectures streamline communication pathways and minimize bottlenecks. Peer-to-peer communication models, consensus algorithms, and distributed databases play pivotal roles in optimizing resource utilization and response times. The abstract emphasizes how decentralization aligns with the demands of contemporary distributed systems, addressing challenges posed by the ever-growing scale and complexity of modern applications.
In conclusion, the abstract underscores the significance of decentralized architectures as a transformative paradigm, offering a robust foundation for building scalable, fault-tolerant, and efficient distributed systems in the face of evolving technological landscapes.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
Buterin, V. (2013). Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform.
Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy.
Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger.
Castro, M., & Liskov, B. (1999). Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance.
Ongaro, D., & Ousterhout, J. (2014). In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm.
Decker, C., & Wattenhofer, R. (2013). Information propagation in the Bitcoin network.
Bonneau, J., Miller, A., Clark, J., Narayanan, A., Kroll, J. A., & Felten, E. W. (2015). SoK: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies.
Zohar, A. (2015). Bitcoin: under the hood.
Gilad, Y., Hemo, R., Micali, S., Vlachos, G., & Zeldovich, N. (2017). Algorand: Scaling Byzantine Agreements for Cryptocurrencies.
Swanson, T. (2015). Consensus-as-a-Service: A Brief Report on the Emergence of Permissioned, Distributed Ledger Systems.
Eyal, I., & Sirer, E. G. (2014). Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable.
Vukolic, M. (2015). The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: Proof-of-work vs. BFT replication.
Miller, A., Kosba, A., Katz, J., & Shi, E. (2014). Nonoutsourceable Scratch-Off Puzzles to Discourage Bitcoin Mining Coalitions.
Androulaki, E., Karame, G. O., Roeschlin, M., Scherer, T., & Capkun, S. (2013). Evaluating user privacy in bitcoin.
Kiayias, A., Russell, A., David, B., & Oliynykov, R. (2017). Ouroboros: A Provably Secure Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol.
Sompolinsky, Y., & Zohar, A. (2015). Secure high-rate transaction processing in Bitcoin.
Lamport, L., Shostak, R., & Pease, M. (1982). The Byzantine Generals Problem.
Eberhardt, J. (2016). Casper: A Decentralized, Proof-of-Stake-Based Blockchain Protocol.
Cachin, C., & Vukolić, M. (2017). Blockchain Consensus Protocols in the Wild.
